My point is not related to technical issues.
Just plain time to update the contents.
Stef
Le 4/4/15 16:19, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
stepharo wrote
there is a huge time / energy investment problems.
I don't see it. The simplest thing (which is 0 extra work AFAICT) would be
to tag the last version before we start updating for 5.0 as something like
'Pharo-4-final'. Almost as easy would be to have a branch per version, so
e.g. typos could be merged back if someone was interested. But maybe I'm
missing something - where specifically do you see the time & energy
investment? Because I think we could've set it up in less time than it took
me to write this reply!
-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/UpdatedPharoByExample-for-3-0-4-0-5-0-tp4817514p4817525.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
