Le 07/04/2015 17:47, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
One more question. How do I get the new source string? Because if I
use #sourceCode I get old code, if I use #printString it also puts
extra parenthesis.

#formattedCode

Thierry

Uko

On 07 Apr 2015, at 17:39, Thierry Goubier
<[email protected]> wrote:

Le 07/04/2015 17:24, Marcus Denker a écrit :

On 07 Apr 2015, at 17:20, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi, I need to change source code of a method by for example
adding a pragma. Can I just manipulate it’s AST without
carrying about source code anchors? Because it seems that I
have to set from/to values and it looks painful.


I would do the change, print the code and recompile it… not nice,
but for now the easiest.

I conccur with Marcus. It's good enough; RB works this way.

Note that you can change the AST without bothering with the from/to
stuff, in most cases (except syntax errors messages?).

(this way they old AST gets garbage collected and the new one has
all the offsets into the text correct).

It's a lot easier than trying to shift the offsets depending on
what you have added/not added.

I would like to explore if we can’t build a system where
everything we manipulate is ASTs…

You're the compiler guy: everything is an AST :)

Thierry







Reply via email to