> On 13 Apr 2015, at 17:35, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:52, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:49, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that is bad.
>>>>
>>>> Can you write a short mail or issue entry about what you did exactly, so
>>>> that others can try to debug this situation ?
>>>
>>> I did
>>>
>>> PharoSourcesCondenser condenseNewSources
>>>
>>> and the after the class comment of LargePositiveInteger is empty, the class
>>> comment of others are wrong.
>>> (e.g. LargeNegativeInteger is
>>>
>>> "s
>>> ^ separators”
>>
>>
>> The method sources seem to be ok: I can recompile everything with no problem.
>> (that I tested already some weeks ago not to run into the famous “condense
>> sources does not work” issue
>> a day before the release… of course, it was not enough).
>>
>
> I think we fixed it… slice incoming.
>
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-comments
<https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15336/Writing-a-new-souces-brakes-class-comments>
Marcus
