Speaking of examples, what is the point of having the "play" button on the class side examples, when they are not actually usable examples? Is it related to a different discussion about (gt)examples in another thread?
But the forms (and their api) do look nice compared to spec/moprhic. I wonder how this could be merged. (After all Brick seems to be based on Morphs and Spec is above Morphs.) Peter On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2015-04-17 10:28 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> It's in the release because it is useful :). >> >> Indeed, some previews related to fonts do not render well, but you get >> the same problem in the Inspector. But, most previews are not that bad. See >> for example: >> [image: Inline image 1] >> >> But, there is another point. This mechanism allows people to hook their >> examples in the basic spotter. For example, Roassal examples can be found >> there. >> > > Indeed, for this example it looks really good (and is useful). > > I was afraid all examples, rendering some UI-Component, would look so ugly. > How it comes the other examples doesn't look like this one? > > > > > >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Why is this in the release? >>> >>> GTSpotter now shows the result of gtExamples in the preview. >>> This looks so ugly. >>> (for example browse the "Examples" cateogry for GLMCompositeBrick) >>> >>> If new features aren't mentioned anywhere, it is pretty difficult >>> to test or to review them. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > >
