> On 21 Apr 2015, at 10:36, Christophe Demarey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > To come back to my proposition, it is just a first step to BDD to not prevent > people to define tests with something like > shouldAccountBalanceBePositiveAfterEachOperation (more behavior driven) > rather than testMyWonderfulMethod that may leads people to test the > implementation details and not the expected behavior.
Not that your naming ideas are bad, but right now you can write testAccountShouldBePositiveAfterEachOperation which is not that bad
