2015-04-29 12:49 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: >> On 29 Apr 2015, at 17:39, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote: >> In the case of GLORP, which I'm updating too, TimeStamp use is more >> extended, because it's also a datatype used to map table columns, but >> using no timezone offset. I guess if we move to DateAndTime we should >> preserve that behavior in order to not break anything.
> I don't understand this last point, could you elaborate ? > As far as I see it, there is nothing TimeStamp did that DateAndTime cannot do. Me neither. But I simply don't wan't to break anything. :) >> ps: I'm so tempted to fork from the GLORP package, rename as something >> else (PLORM?) and refactor it mercilessly. > That is something else ;-) :)
