> On 21 May 2015, at 16:31, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > 56 <=> 43 --> -1 > > "abcd" <=> "defgh" --> +1
I said “object oriented”… :p > > > Just get a numerical result out of it. > > Phil > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com > <mailto:maxle...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> On 21 May 2015, at 15:01, p...@highoctane.be <mailto:p...@highoctane.be> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com >> <mailto:s...@clipperadams.com>> wrote: >> Squeak 4.6 "Spur" Release Notes >> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6192 <http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6192> >> >> Tag sort functions looks great to have around. >> >> About the spaceship operator (<=>), is this something we'd like to have >> around? (I like it). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-way_comparison >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-way_comparison> > > How would you make this “object oriented”? Have three singleton objects > “Less”, “Greater”, “Equal” (similar to “True”, "False”), and on those object > methods “ifLess:”, “ifEqual:”, “ifGreater:”? > >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> ----- >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Opportunity-to-steal-good-ideas-from-dad-tp4827836.html >> >> <http://forum.world.st/Opportunity-to-steal-good-ideas-from-dad-tp4827836.html> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com >> <http://nabble.com/>. >> >> >> >> >> -- > > > >
