Yes!
> On 03 Jun 2015, at 10:07, Johan Brichau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marcus, > > I hope I’ve done this right: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15680 > <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15680> > > thanks > Johan > >> On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:34, Marcus Denker <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >>> On 03 Jun 2015, at 09:28, Johan Brichau <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is the procedure to get fixes backported in 4.0? >>> >>> For example, the fix to this one [1] is really needed for us (it breaks >>> development and also gettext tools). >>> >>> Is there anything you guys do “automatically” or do I need to make a fix >>> for 4.0 based on the one for 5.0 ? >> >> No, we do back ports when they are so important that people ask. I think >> this is a good metrik. >> >> What you do is to add a second issue with the title >> >> Backport 4.0: <Original title> >> >> and put it as the *parent* of the Pharo5 issue. >> >>> >>> [1] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15666 >>> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15666> >>> >>> cheers >>> Johan >> >
