If not we could maybe write a yaml parser :) http://yaml.org/
It has no brackets, it is also hierarchical and it supports comments. El lun., 8 de jun. de 2015 a la(s) 5:16 p. m., Sven Van Caekenberghe < [email protected]> escribió: > > > On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> I am not so sure we should add that. > >> > >> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of fear of > abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic meaning outside the > spec). > > > > > > really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are very > > important. Even more when the configuration files are templates for new > > users. > > I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not originally > anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing configuration files was not > the original goal. STON is a version of JSON that is closer to our object > model. > > Like I said, I will think about it. > > > -- > > Damien Cassou > > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > > losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill > > > > >
