2015-07-22 20:11 GMT+02:00 Paul DeBruicker <[email protected]>: > Is there a spec for XML documents and if so what does it say is the correct > behavior? > > I don't know.
> I would guess the encoding declaration is optional according to the spec > and > shouldn't be relied on in the test as being there in default. Probably > need > to add the encoding explicitly if its required by the consumer of the XML > document. > > We should change the tests. How or who can do this? And how do we make the pharo issue tracker image use that version? > > > > > > > Nicolai Hess wrote > > change in XMLWriter: > > Name: XML-Writer-Core-monty.40 > > Author: monty > > Time: 15 June 2015, 4:35:12.313879 am > > UUID: 632db1a0-b6a6-4686-924e-a9bbb2b843b4 > > Ancestors: XML-Writer-Core-monty.39 > > > > xml declaration writers no longer output "encoding=UTF-8" by default > > > > But now, CIXMLPublisherTest test fails, the test case expects a result > > with "encoding=UTF-8" > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/xmlwriter-change-brakes-an-issuetracker-image-test-tp4838622p4838718.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >
