2015-07-26 15:49 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > Well, If there wouldn't be already a way to do it, I wouldn't care which > one to take. But this is not the case: we are discussing the introduction > of a new vocabulary when there is already another who is fulfilling the > place. > In that sense, the proposed method solves a problem who is actually not > there. > If we do not like #<<, then we should remove it from system, but please, > let's not add a more limited method when we have a more generic one who > does the job... >
<< is horrible, it reminds me to std::cout in C++ and all those cryptic languages where you cannot write a line without checking the API reference manual. Hernán
