2015-08-10 22:17 GMT+02:00 Merwan Ouddane <[email protected]>:

> 200 seems perfect to me.
>
Same feeling :)

>
> Does anyone else have other preferences ? :)
>
>
> Le 10/08/2015 21:56, stepharo a écrit :
>
>> may be the default should be 250.
>> Can you try and let us know?
>>
>>
>> Le 10/8/15 17:39, Merwan Ouddane a écrit :
>>
>>> Yes.
>>> Specially if you have a bad timing, you start to type your method name
>>> and the pop-up shows up just before you press enter ><
>>>
>>> On lun., 2015-08-10 at 17:27 +0200, Franck Warlouzet wrote:
>>>
>>>> On every image I take, I replace the delay from 500 to 100 and it is
>>>> fast (too much maybe for some people) enough, 500 is far too much, you
>>>> finished to type in a half second.
>>>>
>>>> Franck
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:22:05 +0200
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Make the auto completion pop-up appear faster
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there is
>>>> Settings > Code Browsing > Code Completion... > Popup appearance delay
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So I guess the question should be whether the _default_ delay should
>>>> be shorter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Showing popup immediately may not be so useful, because you haven't
>>>> typed much...
>>>> I personally prefer to use shortcut to force the popup to show up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Thomas Heniart
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>          Hi,
>>>>          There is a setting for this
>>>>                            Cheers,
>>>>                   Thomas
>>>>                            2015-08-10 16:16 GMT+02:00 Merwan Ouddane
>>>>          <[email protected]>:
>>>>                  Hi,
>>>>                                   I wanted to have your opinion on this
>>>> case:
>>>>
>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15697/Speed-up-the-autocompletion-pop-up-appearance-delay
>>>>                                   Cheers,
>>>>                  Merwan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to