Then the name is misleading :) The dependency to Glamour should go through the #stable version. This is the one that gets maintained. The blocks inside versions are meant for describing variations between environment versions, but I do not want to go there.
Doru On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > Tudor Girba-2 wrote > > MagritteGlamourForPharo40 should ideally not > > depend on GT-Inspector > > It's purpose is to depend on GT-Inspector :) It's a hack to get a few > enhancements loadable in Pharo 4.0. It seemed like I had to do it this way > because IIUC Glamour has declared subsequent versions with fixes for Pharo > 5.0, but there are no #pharo40 and #pharo50 blocks in the config - only > #common. If I am wrong, I'd much rather to it the proper way. Please > advise... > > BTW this should be fixed. Let me know if it works. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/VoyageMongo-Could-not-resolve-GT-Inspector-GT-Inspector-SeanDeNigris-308-tp4845090p4845134.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
