why not both ? On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:45 PM stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
> *) It appears that Pharo is removing subString: in favor of > substring:. The ANSI standard defines subString:. > > I was not aware of it. In fact ANSI is bad and totally incomplete > (for example we studies strings and this is a mess and totally > incomplete). > Now we should probably add it. I will send the mail to the > mailing-list and let people decide. > > > > >
