I’m happy to get feedback. Just wanted to know that I care about the issues :)
> On 07 Sep 2015, at 22:07, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not complaining. I know that there is a good chance that we break the > system when improving it. > I have no problem with that and I prefer a living system with some bugs for a > while than a dead system with no bug :) > I'm just trying to help handling this problem. > This is alpha with all the risks. > Stef > > Le 7/9/15 00:46, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit : >> I think that it is related to how I was working with Nautilus announcements. >> Now as announcements are changed, I can improve that. Just give me a bit of >> time :) >> >> Uko >> >>> On 06 Sep 2015, at 22:17, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I thought that I could reproduce the QA concurrent access raising a DNU >>> when we remove a method >>> but I failed. >>> I got again this bug. >>> What I did was selecting a method in Nautilus and removing this method >>> after an implementors and from the message list browser. >>> But I cannot reproduce it. >>> >>> Stef >>> >> >> > >
