[Pharo-dev] Pedantic on Random>>nextValue method name

[Ben Coman]

In Random>>nextValue I notice the comment: "This method does NOT
update the seed; repeated sends answer the same value."  Thus the
following produces all the same values...

    oc := OrderedCollection new.
    r := Random new.
    5 timesRepeat: [ oc add: r nextValue ] .
    oc inspect.

Am I being too pedantic thinking this ancient method should be named
#currentValue.  Are there historical constraints to be wary of?  Its
only significant in-Image sender is Random>>next which would then
be...

    ^  (seed := self currentValue) / m

cheers -ben