Exactly! This is the cheapest way to document the process. We could even try to automatically remove the inbox if there is another repository associated with a package. What do you think?
Cheers, Doru On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Also: > >> I did a simple fix on NautilusGroupAutoBuilder package - there is > >> a ConfigurationOfNautilusGroupAutoBuilder. But is it managed internally > >> or externally now? > >> > > Even I can not tell you. > > > > I think the rule we should adopt: if there is a dedicated repository > defined in the image for a package, people should commit > there. If there is non (just the inbox), then this should be used (with > the Slice mechanism). > > The repositories in the image should be already up to date, I think. > > Marcus > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
