> On 19 Sep 2015, at 11:40, Peter Uhnák <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is no reason to expect that files.pharo.org links will not rot
> away for such unusual content.
> Also I'm pretty sure that copying it there is against copyright; this
> however also applies for Web Archive (plus the owner of the domain can
> retroactively remove content from Web Archive).
> So why not just put there the name of the article (and it's DOI),
> which is sufficient to always trace the article (just like any
> reference in any article), and have the regular link for convenience?
>
Yes, that is the way to go.
> Peter
>
> p.s.: pharo.com is a hedge fund ;)
>
They had enough money to buy the domain…
Marcus
