Le 5/10/15 22:27, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
On 05 Oct 2015, at 22:23, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
marcus this is about completion not syntax hilighting and the logic can be
tricky.
The student that was planning to work on it used a statistcal model that shows
that it was much better than the default eclipse one.
Now he just left.
He was from Delft :).
The idea to rely on sat can help you to understand whether you are typing a
parameter (variable, literal) or a message, and whether it is the beginning of
a new message or a continuation of a keyword one.
ah ok then.
Uko
P.S. I’m not AST expert, but this is how I understand some things
Stef
Le 5/10/15 09:25, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 05 Oct 2015, at 08:39, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/10/15 23:53, Peter Uhnák wrote:
This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations...
...but first of all:
do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is
really poor and not only that nobody is doing anything about it, *but
also nobody is complaining*; this leads me to believe that you either
a) don't have the manpower (this is true pretty much always, so no
complaints here)
Definitely.
The issue tracker has lots of interesting completion related issues, like
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13124/NECContext-needs-plugin-design
Yes, and we need to change it to use the AST instead of Shout… that could
simplify it a lot.
Marcus
