> On 26 Oct 2015, at 14:05, Thierry Goubier <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 26/10/2015 11:37, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : >> >>> On 22 Oct 2015, at 09:13, Cyril Ferlicot <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> For now >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:57 AM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Excellent >>>> >>>> How did you do it? >>>> >>> >>> I removed the hardcode value of the default row height in order use >>> the size of the default font. "StandardFont defaultfont pixelSize" or >>> something like that. (Can't check now). >>> But as Esteban said this is maybe not the best solution since a FT can >>> store something else than a string. >> >> Yes… this *has* to be transmitted to the data source. Just there you can >> know how to calculate height. > > I have a nagging feeling that basing FT on the knowledge of all rows height > is not scalable for very large datasources.
I have the same feeling, that’s why I put it out at the first time… at first moment, datasource should answer a constant, not a variable size (FT does not know what to do with them right now). But then, is a good place to start doing experiments :) Esteban > > I'll let you try and see where you end up ;) > > Thierry
