Hi Alex,

thanks, this is very usefull. Can you tell which one of these measures is
the closest to the effective length of a string morph? Number 4?

Thierry

2015-10-27 12:02 GMT+01:00 Aliaksei Syrel <[email protected]>:

> Hi
>
> I'm sending it here so that it doesn't get lost.
>
>
> There are multiple ways to measure string width. In the following examples
> performance will be tested measuring 10`000 times the width of the
> following string:
>
> *string := 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 0123456789!@#$%^&*()_+'.*
>
> 1) The most straightforward way is to send #widthOfString: to the font.
> Time to run gives around 250ms.
> http://ws.stfx.eu/2Q5YA9DFTRDR
> Resulting value is rounded to integer and seems to be not absolutely
> correct and precise.
>
> 2) More complex way is to go deeper on the level of glyphs and manually
> summarise the width of each character in the string sending
> #getGlyphWidth: character to the font. Time to run gives around 750ms.
> http://ws.stfx.eu/ETBEW1EHAAZ8
> Resulting value is float and looks like correct and precise value.
>
> 3) Even more complex is to use CairoFontMetricsProvider instead of font's
> methods. The same as in 2nd case we measure each character. Time to run
> around 350ms.
> http://ws.stfx.eu/7I89DMD0ZLM3
> Resulting value is exactly the same as in the 2nd case. With almost equal
> performance to 1st it is nice alternative.
>
> 4) One more way is to let native cairo to calculate everything for us.
> Calls happen through nativeboost. Time to run around 120ms.
> http://ws.stfx.eu/HYD76OMIOM7L  <http://ws.stfx.eu/HYD76OMIOM7L>
> As result it returns *CairoTextExtents* which allows to calculate width
> and height with one call.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>

Reply via email to