> On 16 Dec 2015, at 13:46, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi. > > 2015-12-16 13:33 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>: > > On 16 Dec 2015, at 13:24, Clément Bera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't know if SqueakV3 - Spur32 support is needed, however, I think it is > > really important to be able to serialize and materialize objects between 32 > > bits spur images and 64bits spur images. > > I don't know. > > Yes it would be nice, but since Fuel cannot even exchange data between > different version itself (If I understand the situation correctly), why > should that have to work ? > > It is needed to use fuel as communication format between services which run > on different platforms. For example you can exchange data between 64bits > server and 32bits android phone.
What you want might not be the same to what it was designed for. I might be wrong, but that is how I understood it from discussion in the past when moving data from one fuel version to another. Let's see what the Fuel guys have to say about this.
