and so is auto completion ;) On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:03 PM stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
> How can we proceed? > Because this coloring functionality is really important. > > Stef > > > anyone an idea? > > I'm trying to think. > Looks like it would be good to be able to make a distinction between > symbols and selectors (selectors installed > in method dictionaries) > > > yes, this would improve code completion a bit, too, as there are more > symbols than symbols that are actually names > of methods. > > The data could be created per environment (Smalltalk globals) the first > time and then cached till shutdown. > (it would be an array of size 46451, pointing to existing symbols). > > The environment could cache sent selectors, too… pablo did an experiment > with that. > > Marcus > > >
