> On 19 Jan 2016, at 15:23, Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It turns the search field into a "kind of" command line interface, with 
> #sen/#ref as commands.
> I love CLIs so I welcome it, but I think It "perverts" the search field and 
> uses an awkward syntax. I prefer to type "senders" than to type a special 
> character like #.
> 
> I would prefer adding a suffix command so you search for 'do: senders' or 
> 'do: implementors’.

just that there is no syntactical way to know when you want senders or just 
retrieve methods who start with do: and continue with keyword sen… etc.
that’s the reason from the hashtag (which is now a common symbol to filter/tag 
like in twitter/facebook/etc.) 

cheers,
Esteban

> 
> Regards!
> 
> 
> Esteban A. Maringolo
> 
> 2016-01-19 10:43 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Hi,
> 
> With the latest GT integration, we also integrated the search for senders and 
> references from the first step.
> 
> Here is a detailed explanation about it, including what we still want to do, 
> how it’s done, and how to discover what else is around:
> http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/spotting-senders-references-with-gtspotter/
>  
> <http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/spotting-senders-references-with-gtspotter/>
> 
> <spotter-senders.png>
> 
> Please let us know what you think.
> 
> Cheers,
> Doru
> 
> 
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
> www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com/>
> 
> "Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem 
> understanding."
> 

Reply via email to