And yes, linux VM's are not shipped with the UUID plugin... at least not
since 2014/2013...
Also, I believe the plugin is not compiled as internal since it is not
listed in
Smalltalk vm listBuiltinModules.
Smalltalk vm listLoadedModules.
On 02/04/2016 11:12 AM, Guille Polito wrote:
On 02/04/2016 10:58 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
But StHub did not change for a long time, no ?
I know...
Saving to an HTTP MC repo is nothing more than an HTTP PUT.
You should be able to do that manually with just ZnClient.
Well, yes. But I'm just clicking the save button on the monticello
browser...
Now, I tested with squeaksource3:
- I commit in squeaksource 3 using the monticello browser: the file in
package-cache is OK, the file in squeaksource3 is OK
http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss?_s=WvI7T3UuBKEaYUrR&_k=ukyWjav7hA-MhHIz
- I make a copy of the file from the monticello UI to a smalltalkhub
repository. The file in smalltalkhub is not the one I want.
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Guille/playground/diff/test-GuillermoPolito.4
In both Squeaksource3 and Smalltalkhub I have the same UUID, project
name, version number, commit message, but the MCZ file that I download
from them is different. Even, making a diff from SmalltalkHub's UI
shows me a diff against a completely different package (RoboticTable)
that is from Santiago Bragagnolo, and that I guess it is a private
project because it is not listed and cannot browsed.
Making a diff on other versions, such as
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Guille/playground/diff/test-GuillermoPolito.2
, makes a diff against a version of the Makros package, which is also
from Santiago Bragagnolo, but this is not a private project.
Aaaand, now I see a problem!
both my test package:
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Guille/playground/diff/test-GuillermoPolito.2
and the one of Santiago
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~sbragagnolo/Makros/versions/Makros-SantiagoBragagnolo.32
have the same UUID!!!!!!
Maybe this is because of my debian 64bits? Hmm maybe the UUID plugin
is not loading? I'll check that for now, because I cannot work if I
cannot commit :). If somebody has an idea, It is VERY welcome!
Thanks for reading my loud ranting/reasoning,
Guille
On 04 Feb 2016, at 10:52, Guille Polito <[email protected]>
wrote:
So far, I'm blaming Smalltalkhub:
- I create a new empty package.
- I commit it to a local directory, it works ok.
- I commit it to a smalltalkhub repository: the file in my package
cache is ok, but the file in smalltalkhub is corrupted
e.g.,
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Guille/playground/versions/test-GuillermoPolito.3
The strange thing is that it is a recurrent bug. I cannot commit to
smalltalkhub, not even do a push of a version in my package cache.
Smalltalkhub always shows a buggy version.
I'll now try with squeaksource 3 to narrow my conclusions.
On 02/04/2016 10:33 AM, Guille Polito wrote:
I tried for one hour yesterday to understand the problem :). This
morning my priority was to not lose my code because I noticed the
bug a couple of hours after my commits... Thanks I remembered to
save my image and that the good old fileout in .st is working!
I'll keep trying to reproduce and keep you posted
On 02/04/2016 10:21 AM, stepharo wrote:
Hi guille
Esteban got some problems with MC recently
so it would be good to have a reproducible case.
Stef
Le 4/2/16 10:07, Guille Polito a écrit :
Ok, I am puzzled. I downloaded a new fresh image, in a fresh
directory, worked on something else, committed, and my commit is
completely broken.
Attached screenshot of what monticello shows me.
I'm on debian jessie 64bits. Maybe it has something to do?
On 02/03/2016 03:41 PM, Guille Polito wrote:
Hi all,
I'm finally back, rechecking this issue:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7241/Object-name-should-best-be-removed
I remade the Slice to load in latest Pharo5 with the new Spur
changes, plus some fixes proposed by Nicolai. I can load the
slice in a new image and everything looks ok. So far so good.
Now, the monkey starts checking the Slice and somehow it cannot
load the Slice due to "dependencies to some classes". Of course,
the slice I submitted does not depend on the packages on the
complaint, and locally it loads well. Moreover, I never
had/worked with those classes, nor they were installed in my
system. Even, I have a new machine which is clean so I cannot
believe I have some interference due to some package cache...
The message of the monkey is here:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-5.0-Issue-Validator/26128//artifact/validationReport.html
Did somebody find some similar problem or it is just me? I
believe the problem is on the monkey side, but I have no clue...
Maybe somebody has a better idea.
Thanks!
Guille
