I do not think that Pharo will become a static language :)
For the moment we can let it as a documentation.
Now I would prefer to have tests because such annotations may be obsolete.
Anyway the code quality of aleksei is really good.
Le 23/2/16 10:33, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
At the moment, it is used for documentation purposes in Bloc. It is part of the
effort of Alex to document Bloc thoroughly. I think it is an interesting idea,
in that we would have a significant case study for that can be used later as
optional types information to improve static tool support. And it does not hurt
at the moment.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Doru
On Feb 23, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Alain Plantec via Pharo-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
From: Alain Plantec <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] [Bloc] Do we want <return: #Point> or <return: Point>
Date: February 23, 2016 at 10:23:33 AM GMT+1
To: Pharo Development List <[email protected]>
I don’t like it too.
Alain
Le 23 févr. 2016 à 09:50, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> a écrit :
2016-02-23 9:47 GMT+01:00 stepharo <[email protected]>:
Hi
I saw that something <return: #Point> or <return: Point>
I do not know why but I have the impression that <return: #Point> is better.
Because we may have code not present and still want to load the code.
I would like to know for what this is used.
I don't like it.
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"We are all great at making mistakes."
