I personally never liked the name “SciSmalltalk”. “SciPharo” is much better in my opinion PhaNum is also okay to me.
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <[email protected]> wrote: > > SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. > What is so much pharo specific in this library? > Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split? > > 2016-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Serge Stinckwich <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > This is great news! > > > > I would be interested in time series and distributions as well. > > Distributions are already there. I start some early work on time series. > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ <http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/> > >
