Why do we need those sophisticated past-something form after should at all? Why not simply
mock should receive someMessage ? -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2016-04-20 11:35 GMT+03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>: > Hi. > > People start argue that my choice of names are not good. > > For now Mocketry use "should got" to verify that following message was > occurred: > > mock *should got* someMessage > > > This is broken for native english speakers. Do you agree to replace it > with correct #haveReceived? > Can we use more short version #haveGot? > > mock should haveReceived someMessage > > mock should haveGot someMessage > > > Also there is new expression to verify how object was received during > test: > > result should *beReturnedFrom:* [mock someMessage] > > > Should it be #haveReturnedFrom: ? > > > result should haveReturnedFrom: [mock someMessage] > > > I hope we can make consensus and be happy with Mocketry. > > Best regards, > Denis >
