Ben, This thread mail subject is Pharo 5.0 release (there is no beta), and even if you are right please take a look at http://files.pharo.org/sources/, there's a PharoV50.sources. And also if you try to open a Pharo5.0.image , it will ask for the file PharoV50.sources.
thanks On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Esteban, > > I tried again and it doesn't work. :( > > But now i found another issue, if you take a look to pharo5.0/shared > > folder you will see the file PharoV40.sources (wrong version for this > > release) > > This is the correct sources for Pharo5-*beta*. It doesn't become > PharoV50.sources until the changes file is compacted for actual > *release*. However I understand the confusion. I think this naming > is based off the Squeak workflow, where IIUC they just work in, for > example 4.5, and don't call it 4.6 until just weeks before release. > But we've called it Pharo 5 (beta) for 12 months. > > I have thought a few times myself that maybe for Pharo 6 we could have > PharoV60dev.sources and later PharoV60.sources. > > cheers -ben > > > > > > thanks > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > On 01 May 2016, at 10:59, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: > >> >> Hi Esteban, > >> >> i found a problem with one of the packages, see below > >> >> > >> >> ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. > >> >> 6521) > >> > > >> > So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one > >> > >> yes, but Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip should download a spur vm… I need to > >> review that :) > >> > >> Esteban > >> > >> > > >> > Stephan > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Bernardo E.C. > > > > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. > > -- Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.
