The name is .pharo or pharo ? If we have multiple images in the same directory, they will share the /pharo repository ?
On 6/23/16, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Since some time I’ve seen growing the amount of files/directories generated > when running Pharo. Up to Pharo 2.0, we had just this: > > Pharo.image > Pharo.changes > PharoDebug.log > pharo-cache > > now we have: > > Pharo.image > Pharo.changes > PharoDebug.log > pharo-cache > epicea-sessions > play-cache > play-stash > > it does not looks like much, but I think this does not looks professional > (we take too much from user space). So I proposed (and implemented) a > “concentrator” directory: > > Pharo.image > Pharo.changes > ./pharo > … and everything for “pharo working internally” here > > then users have again control about what they have along with the image > (this allows to some nice strategies too, when we want a version that does > not pollutes the file dir). > > of course, this idea follows other developing spaces, where things are > stored in same fashion way… for example in eclipse for java they store all > eclipse data under .workspace directory. > > so, please note that this is NOT user space… regular pharo users will store > his files along with the image, for instance filetree repositories… > something like: > > Pharo.image > Pharo.changes > .pharo/ > voyage/ > punqlite/ > etc. > > well… I will commit a SLICE with the changes soon (is not a hard change at > all). > > But then: > > is ./pharo a good name? > will this work? > > Esteban > -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
