Is it normal that a clean 60178 image is still missing the class after loading GitFileTree from the catalog?
On 4 June 2016 at 09:37, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > This is why we need to have metadata of loaded packages inside the image. > > Because right now the maintainer of the package is forced to remove > information from his configuration :( > > Been there with RB. > > > Setf > > > Le 3/6/16 à 13:38, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > > yes, but then GitFileTree from catalog is downloading a wrong version :) >> >> On 03 Jun 2016, at 13:28, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> STON is now (in 6.0) used as JSON parser. >>> >>> On 03 Jun 2016, at 13:24, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> this class is not there anymore : >>>> >>>> MCFileTreeJsonParser >>>> >>>> (Pharo 6.0 version) >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
