2016-08-19 5:47 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: > > On 19 Aug 2016, at 10:43, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think “apply” is better. “import” sounds too specific to me. I don’t want > to care where the entries come from and “import” implies that there may be > something else going on (also: if there’s an import where’s the export?).
> +1 :) +1 here I was thinking about apply/revert as well. If you use git-cherry-pick its description says: "Apply the changes introduced by some existing commits" I prefer it. Esteban A. Maringolo
