Hi Stef,

2016-08-29 8:35 GMT+02:00 stepharo <[email protected]>:

> This is a really nice and important question.
> I would really have a clear answer because it will make the system more
> stable.
>
> If you can build an analysis and let us know it would be really great.
>
>
> Something related but not on the same topic is that I would love to have a
> syntax for nested comments.
>
> This is really annoying to have to uncomment parts when we have to comment
> a large part. We discussed this back in 2007-2009 but we never did it.
>

If your need is that (uncomment while commenting and the reverse), then the
answer is not a syntax change, but a better comment/uncomment command in
the editor.

Now that you say that, I also have the issue. I'll have a try in AltBrowser
if I can get the behavior you'd like.

Thierry


>
>
> Stef
>
>
> Le 28/8/16 à 12:17, Nicolai Hess a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>>
>> where can I find a good reference about what characters are allowed as
>> binary selectors (from old syntax definition) and what is nowadays allowed
>> by the implementations.
>>
>> And whether the current set of allowed binaries selector includes some
>> additions on
>> purpose or if this is just a bug of the parser.
>>
>> From what I found out,  (Blue book and some other smalltalk syntax
>> definitions)
>> the current set of allowed characters includes the "special characters":
>> $! $% $& $* $+ $, $- $/ $< $= $> $? $@ $\ $| $~
>> (some implementation do not allow $@ and some calls $- not a special
>> character
>> but allowed as binary selector character)
>>
>> And this is what String>>#numArgs uses. Therefore
>>
>> '-' numArgs "->1".
>> '!' numArgs "->1".
>> And for example:
>> '§' numArgs "-> -1 (the -1 is indicating "not even a valid selector")"
>>
>> But I am interested in the characters not called "special characters and
>> not even in the range 0-126.
>>
>> The scanner allowes much more characters to be used as a selector name
>> (From the scanners typeTable) :
>>
>> {Character value: 1 . Character value: 2 . Character value: 3 . Character
>> value: 4 . Character value: 5 . Character value: 6 . Character value: 7 .
>> Character backspace . Character value: 11 . Character value: 14 . Character
>> value: 15 . Character value: 16 . Character value: 17 . Character value: 18
>> . Character value: 19 . Character value: 20 . Character value: 21 .
>> Character value: 22 . Character value: 23 . Character value: 24 . Character
>> value: 25 . Character value: 26 . Character escape . Character value: 28 .
>> Character value: 29 . Character value: 30 . Character value: 31 . $! . $% .
>> $& . $* . $+ . $, . $- . $/ . $< . $= . $> . $? . $@ . $\ . $` . $~ .
>> Character delete . $€ . $ . $‚ . $ƒ . $„ . $… . $† . $‡ . $ˆ . $‰ . $Š . $‹
>> . $Œ . $ . $Ž . $ . $ . $‘ . $’ . $“ . $” . $• . $– . $— . $˜ . $™ . $š .
>> $› . $œ . $ . $ž . $Ÿ . $  . $¡ . $¢ . $£ . $¤ . $¥ . $¦ . $§ . $¨ . $© .
>> $« . $¬ . $­ . $® . $¯ . $° . $± . $² . $³ . $´ . $¶ . $· . $¸ . $¹ . $» .
>> $¼ . $½ . $¾ . $¿ . $× . $÷}
>>
>> This means you can define a method with for example the name "÷".
>>
>> So , the question I want to ask. What do we want to allow as a binary
>> selector (character).
>> All that is nowadays "parseable" as binary selector, or only the set of
>> "special characters"
>> or something between both, and where to put this information, the "this
>> is an allowed binary
>> selector character" information?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Nicolai
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to