> On 07 Sep 2016, at 13:37, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Fraction>>round: numberOfWishedDecimal
> "Round the decimal part of the receiver to be limited to the number of
> wished decimal. Only leave a fixed amount of decimal"
> < expr: (1/3 round: 2) result: 0.33 >
> < expr: (111/100 round: 2) result: 1.11 >
>
> ^self asFloat round: numberOfWishedDecimal
>
>
> this method was changed for case 19034
> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19034/Improve-comment-of-round> Improve
> comment of round:
>
ups… I did not review correctly. I thought that only the comment changed.
Pragmas are not comments...
> But I think
> < expr: (111/100 round: 2) result: 1.11 >
> is actually not a valid pragma expression. (Squeak compiler does not allow
> this).
>
> 1. Do we want to allow this syntax ( I don't want)
No! This would make the system quite unreadable if you add lots of those
everywhere.
Marcus
