> On Sep 10, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Udo Schneider <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 10/09/16 10:52, stepharo wrote: >> So this is what I was trying to get done. >> I do not know if what you propose (which can be better than what I was >> planning) requires to change fileSystem, my goal was not to change for >> now but just make sure that I can get cheaply file to print themselves >> into kind of objects I can manipulate again. >> >> Now if what you propose is better, then first we should introduce a >> logic to handle :file :memory >> >> And I'm not against so plese push it but this is outside of my little >> goal for now. > You're right. Your solution is much simpler - therefore I'd go with your > solution for now. > >> would be nice. Push this idea. Once the community agrees then we can >> easily extend the printOn: behavior. > I'll try to work through the FS code and see if I can get the stuff I'm > thinking about implemented. > >> Did you watch the excellent talk of marcus at ESUG? >> Because I think incrementally > One of the first videos/slidedecks I watched - the title made me curious. My > key take-away is that it's better to implement the cheap/simple/non-perfect > enhancement now than never (too late) the perfect one.
"Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."
