wouldn’t this be better to solve this with QA? > On 3 Nov 2016, at 15:17, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > > Hi > > I often end up forgetting a period. > > printOn: aStream > super printOn: aStream. > aStream nextPutAll: ' "' > aStream nextPutAll: contents. > aStream nextPutAll: '" '. > > > And statically the system could see it with a simple heuristics: > > if the message as the same name as self, super, a tmp or an argument > > May be there is a missing period. > > Could the compiler get this analysis? > > Stef > >
- [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis with great impac... stepharo
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis with gr... Esteban Lorenzano
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis with gr... Nicolai Hess
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis with gr... Yuriy Tymchuk
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis wit... Nicolas Cellier
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis... Yuriy Tymchuk
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static anal... Nicolas Cellier
- Re: [Pharo-dev] some little static analysis... Denis Kudriashov