2016-11-14 11:50 GMT-03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>: > > 2016-11-14 15:37 GMT+01:00 Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com>: >> >> Breaking Metacello in any version = Not good. >> >> Metacello is very backward compatible but breaking pragma semantics >> would require a rewrite of many configurations that work okay today
> Why? ConfigurationOf~ not collect any pragmas by themselves. They only > declare versions by pragmas. You're right. > And we only need to fix Pharo version of Metacello which is already fork. Which is not there yet. Quoting myself: "... and would require a new version of Metacello that contemplates the new selectors based on some criteria." Criteria being pharo version, or anything else that identifies the new pragma semantics. Regards!
