I am always amazed about the cool things I can learn from this list. Phil
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > :) Nice. > > > > > On 23 Nov 2016, at 16:51, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19383/IDNA-punycode-for-Zinc > > > > After loading > > > > Name: Punycode-dTriangle.8 > > Author: dTriangle > > Time: 26 August 2013, 10:19:11.728 am > > UUID: 6493a3ee-43bb-44f0-86a8-5aa47a9b42ff > > Ancestors: Punycode-dTriangle.7 > > > > I can do the following > > > > 'http://üni.ch <http://xn--ni-wka.ch>' asUrl. > > > > "http://xn--ni-wka.ch/"; > > > > 'http://üni.ch <http://xn--ni-wka.ch>' asUrl retrieveContents > includesSubstring: 'Üni'. > > > > "true" > > > > Done ;-) > > > > Thank you, https://twitter.com/osashimitabenai, well done ! > > > > Sven > > > >> On 23 Nov 2016, at 15:43, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 23 Nov 2016, at 15:36, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Great! > >>> > >>> There’s a punycode implementation on smalltalkhub ( > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~dTriangle/Punycode) but it needs some > polishing. > >> > >> Wow, that looks good, it even has ZnUrl integration, so we're done ;-) > >> > >> There are no tests though. > >> > >> How come we never heard of this ? > >> > >> Last commit was in 2013, hopefully the author is still around. > >> > >>> Should I open an issue on FogBugz so we don’t forget? > >> > >> Yes, OK. > >> > >>> Max > >>> > >>>> On 23 Nov 2016, at 15:00, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Max, > >>>> > >>>>> On 23 Nov 2016, at 14:34, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi (Sven), > >>>>> > >>>>> Zinc can’t currently handle unicode domain names (e.g. http://üni.ch > <http://xn--ni-wka.ch>). Are there any plans to implement punycode / IDNA > conversion for Zinc? Or is there an explicit reason not to support it? I > see that # parseHostPort: expects the host portion to be percent escaped, > what is the use case for this? I have never seen a percent escaped host > portion. Usually the host portion is either pure ASCII, unicode or punycode > (in my experience at least). > >>>>> > >>>>> Just curious, as I just added IDNA conversion to one of our > applications (I just let python perform the conversion: > https://docs.python.org/2/library/codecs.html#module-encodings.idna). > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Max > >>>> > >>>> Yes, that would be nice to have. > >>>> > >>>> Just for future reference, we are talking about the following > (IDN(A)): > >>>> > >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name > >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode > >>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3490 > >>>> https://www.charset.org/punycode > >>>> > >>>> Normal DNS hostnames are ASCII only (or used to be like that anyway), > that is why it is (currently) implemented like that. > >>>> > >>>> Sven > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
