"DataSource" is responsible for providing visual elements that represent items in a data set.
I don't see how word "Store" fits here, because DataSource does not store anything. DataSource is also not the best name since it is not a data source itself. An object that is now called DataSource, basically just knows a single function that from mathematical point of view can be defined as follows: f: Object -> Morph . You see, it is a *mapping, not a souse or store.* Cheers, Alex On 29 November 2016 at 09:44, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2016-11-29 9:35 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: > >> yes, something like TableCellSource or TableCellProvider is more >> intention revealing. >> >> >> No, because is not *just* a cell provider. >> TableDataSource, TableStore, TableProvider, yes. >> >> I kind of like “TableStore”. > > > And if we have TableMorph then this guy should be TableMorphStore IMO. >
