Yes, I meant what Denis says. If you abort the refactoring/transformation in case of name clash, then you will have more cases in which the transformation is not applicable.
2016-12-08 14:19 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]>: > > 2016-12-08 14:18 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]>: > >> To be clear, you don't mean Do Nothing; you mean Issue an Error and Abort >>> the Refactoring right? >> >> >> No. "Do Nothing" means that if we already have method with instVar name >> we will skip this accessor. So we will not generate setter if there is >> already method #instVar:. No matter if this method do something wrong >> inside. > > > But getter will be generated in that case. No abort. >
