> On 25 Jan 2017, at 12:04, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2017-01-25 12:03 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > I think problem that these names could be already in use by frameworks. I am > sure #isReadOnly, #beReadOnly is used in many UI's. For example Margitte uses > it > > And probably Glorp
yes, but #setIsReadOnlyObject: deserves a place in the podium of ugly names :) I thought the names were going to be like beWritable/beNotWritable/isWritable which are not a lot better, but well… Esteban
