> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:30 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 27 Jan 2017, at 12:21, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Even though the current default layout is not my preference, it is not >> unusable :). > > Ok, it’s not. But the other one was so nice :) > > >> >> But, let’s do it differently. Would you like to take a look at what it takes >> to build a debugger with your layout? > > Yes I would. But after I figure out how to create tests & documentation > simultaneously for quality rules with gtExamples :). Or I will make a small > prototype of my own and then we will compare similarities with gtExamples. I > think that quality rules are a really nice use case.
You have a deal :). I am looking forward to your experience. Doru > Cheers. > Uko > >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> >>> On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi again, >>> >>> there is still no way to change the debugger layout to have it the same way >>> as Moose… Why did we change layout in Pharo in the first place? It was so >>> nice: you had the stack with the whole highlighting on the side, so you >>> could see more. >>> >>> Why do we have to make things unusable in Pharo? >>> Uko >>> >>> P.S. ok, ok, I guess I will just move to Moose. >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> www.feenk.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow." >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar."
