> On 6 Feb 2017, at 23:01, werner kassens <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 02/06/2017 09:00 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> Regarding the poor seed at startup: >>> 1k outside runs of 'NeoUUIDGenerator new nextRandom16' (on a fresh image) >>> gives me only 116 unique values, compared to the expected 990-1000 >>> In the above it's already second run of the generator, for (random initial) >>> counter, there was only 69 unique values out of 1000. >> But that is not proper use of a random generator, you create a new instance >> every time. You basically test seeding, which is different from random >> number generator proper. >> > Hi, isnt it that, what the thread originally was about? as far as i > understand it, it started with yuriy saying: > > The idea is that each time an image is started a new session is created and > assigned a new UUID...
Certainly for NeoUUIDGenerator, that will be the case, AFAIK. > werner
