Hi lukas
Nice to see you here.
I would start to look at the code and clean what is strange.
- Did you test the difference between the two algorithms?
- Did you play with NECPreferences?
- I would like to see what is the difference between the NOC class and the
NECclass
- I would like to remove the link with Smalltalk tools
- I would be nice to improve the class comments.
- there are some tests for NEC but
-- are there any good? Did you read them?
- there are no tests for NOC
-- it would be nice to add tests.
Looking at the code
quickFillWithCategoriesMatching: pattern
(Smalltalk organization categoriesMatching: pattern) do: [:category |
(Smalltalk organization classesInCategory: category) do: [:e | self
quickFillWithClass: e]]
Smalltalk globals organization
no senders? Remove?
Class categories are an obsolete concepts so we should clean this.
NOCompletionTable comment
I keep track of symbols to be retrieved in ocompletion algorithm. Unlike
ecompletion, I learn something and try to retrieve users last occurences
of typing sequences first, then the system symbols which match.
TODO remove stupid symbols (like packages and method extensions and
timestamp)
Hello to all,
I am a student at the Faculty of Information Technology of the Czech
Technical University in Prague and I decided to make Code Completion in
Pharo the topic of my Bachelor's degree and try to >improve it.
If you have suggestions on what should change / how to change it so you
would be satisfied with it, I will appreciate any input on this topic.
It would mean a lot to me if you could find two minutes >and take this
survey (there are only like 7 questions, so it won't take longer than
those 2 minutes):
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd7lx6gIN079-vMvMwRsnA_AX_e_7sZEz2XJQ4059nk_-LV6w/viewform
Regards
Lukas
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
