I understand that if a developer is building a standalone application, (like Windows, Apache, Slack, Git, ...... PHARO !!! ), then a fuzzy-wuzzy name may make sense. But, there are so many packages that are built for Pharo/Squeak use only, that have cryptic names and no descriptions. This drives me crazy. I see all these package names spewn about and I have no idea what they are. I look on the Pharo website - no explanation. I look on Git - often times little to no explanation. I look on SmalltalkHub - little to no explanation...etc. I look on Catalog Browser - absolutely NO explanation. The only way to find out is start texting message boards or load the code and study the crap out of it just trying to figure out that - "oops, I didn't really want that loaded at all".
With that said, the creator has the right to name their creation anything they want. Just understand, that we ARE wanting to grow our exposure and the we need to make this as easy and pain free as possible. ----- Brad Selfridge -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Any-idea-for-a-cool-name-for-the-remote-tool-suite-tp4932008p4935822.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
