Hello everyone,

This morning I investigated with Vincent Blondeau a problem reported by the
Moose community a while ago: loading Moose model is slower in Spur (Pharo
5+) than in pre-Spur (Pharo 4 and older). In general, this problem was
present for anyone growing images to a significant size.

To investigate the problem, we loaded a 200Mb[3] Moose model on a 250Mb
image, growing the image to 450Mb. Loading such a model takes 2 minutes in
Spur and 1m30s in pre-Spur VMs.

Using the stable Pharo VM, the analysis results were the following:
- total time spent to load the Model: 2 minutes
- time spent in full GC: 1 minute (4 fullGCs)
- time spent in scavenges[1]: 15 seconds
On the 2 minutes spent, we have 50% of the time spent in full GCs, 12.5% in
scavenges, 37.5% executing code.

We then used the latest VM that features the new compactor (VM from
beginning of March 2017 and over). The full GC execution time went down
from 1 minute to 2 seconds.

In addition, we increased the size of Eden[2] from 4Mb to 12Mb. Time spent
in scavenges decreased from 15 seconds to 5 seconds.

Overall, loading the model is now taking ~50 seconds instead of 2 minutes.

To increase Eden size, one needs to run a script similar to:

| currentEdenSize desiredEdenSize |
currentEdenSize := Smalltalk vm parameterAt: 44.
desiredEdenSize := currentEdenSize * 4.
Smalltalk vm parameterAt: 45 put: desiredEdenSize.

*And then restart the image.*

I hope this report can be useful for some of you. I will try to make a blog
post out of it, detailing other GC settings one can change from the image
to improve performance.

Best,

Clement

[1] A scavenge is basically the garbage collection of only young objects
[2] Eden is basically the space where objects are initially allocated.
[3] All numbers in the report are order of magnitudes and not precise
numbers

Reply via email to