Hi, Ok, that is a better reason.
As far as I can tell, the baseline situation is not much better, is it? Cheers, Doru > On Apr 15, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 15/04/2017 23:08, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I do not quite understand the benefit of removing Configurations in Pharo 6. >> Is there a benefit that I do not see? >> >> Cheers, >> Doru >> >> > > If you have a project depending on another project that got his > configuration in the image, the configuration will not be updated if you > do not do it explicitly. > > We found with Pavel that the version of MooseAlgo used by Moose was > outdated because ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos was in the image with 5-6 > commits late. > > Users should not have to update the configuration of the dependencies of > their project by hand in their builds because Pharo has old > configurations inside the image. > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > > http://www.synectique.eu > 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, > 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
