> On 4 Jun 2017, at 02:50, Cyril Ferlicot D. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 04/06/2017 à 02:26, monty a écrit : >> I've seen this before, and I'm not sure it's a bug. >> >> A testless, non-abstract subclass of a TestCase is useless unless it >> inherits test methods. But if it defines its own test methods, then it isn't >> clear if it was made a subclass to inherit test methods, or if it was made a >> subclass to inherit non-test helper methods, or both. I think to be safe it >> assumes the second. >> >> Implement #shouldInheritSelectors in the superclass to get your intended >> behavior. >> >> > > I think that in most case we want the tests from the superclass. At > least this is what I expect. > > A subclass of an object keep the behaviour of its superclass when the > methods are not overridden. Why should it be different for tests? > > I see your point but if that is the case I think it should inherit the > tests by default and we could had a way to prevent this behaviour in > some cases. > > It is very awkward to get less tests after adding a new test in a class. > I think it reduce the power of the tests.
I second that. > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > > http://www.synectique.eu > 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, > 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France >
