On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 04:55:29PM +0200, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> The PR is updated
> 
> -- Pavel

Thanks, Pavel!



> 2017-06-30 16:44 GMT+02:00 Alistair Grant <[email protected]>:
> 
>     Attached is the changeset as discussed in my last email.
> 
>     Just to be clear, this is just for reference, I'm happy to redo the PR
>     if it will save you and/or Pavel some time.
> 
>     Cheers,
>     Alistair
> 
> 
>     On 30 June 2017 at 16:42, Alistair Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
>     > Hi Stef,
>     >
>     > Good pickup.
>     >
>     > I also can't load
>     > SLICE-Issue-20165-Support-segment-path-printing-AlistairGrant.1.
>     > Somehow it is dependent on FileSystem-Core-AlistairGrant.223, and I
>     > have no idea what that is (I don't remember ever creating it, and I
>     > don't have a copy on my machine anywhere, or in any of my backups).
>     >
>     > Fortunately I do have a changeset of the patch.  I'll send it through
>     > as an attachment after I've sent this email in case it causes the
>     > response to be blocked.
>     >
>     > Do you or Pavel have a preference on how to get the PR fixed?  I'm
>     > happy to generate a new PR if you or Pavel can close the existing one
>     > (#126).
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Alistair
>     >
>     >
>     > On 30 June 2017 at 16:09, Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]>
>     wrote:
>     >> Hi alistair
>     >>
>     >> I'm starting to review code that is in the PR pipeline.
>     >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/126
>     >>
>     >> I noticed that you wrote in the slice
>     >>
>     >> Changes since last slice:
>     >>
>     >> - Change Path>>fullName to just print the path
>     >> - Fix absolute path strings
>     >> - Bug fix Path class>>from:delimiter:
>     >> - Add unit tests
>     >>
>     >> But I only see in the PR three methods.
>     >> Can you check because I have the impression that we are losing code
>     somewhere?
>     >>
>     >> BTW I could not see the contents of the AlistairGrant.1 package
>     >> I tried on several images 70 and 60 latest
>     >>
>     >> Stef
>     >>
> 
> 

Reply via email to