Ahh - thats more reassuring. There is quite a lot going on at the moment and so 
it gets a bit overwhelming.

Thanks for all the hard work you’ve put into this by the way - its really 
starting to open up the doors we all needed.

Tim

> On 5 Jul 2017, at 15:02, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> pharo 6 is very stable and should be used in production. 
> every version has bugs, that will not change. Yes, that particular bug can be 
> annoying but it does not happens always (for example, I’m unable to reproduce 
> it, which is in fact part of the reason why I cannot fix it).
> 
> cheers,
> Esteban
> 
>> On 5 Jul 2017, at 14:39, Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> So does that mean we should use the Pharo5 vm for production then? It sounds 
>> like 6 is still a bit bleeding edge and for production applications we 
>> should wait for 6.1?
>> 
>> At the moment it seems a little chaotic - we all like the new features, and 
>> 6 is definitely a breath of fresh air - however if you want to deploy 
>> something commercially then you need stability.
>> 
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 19:28, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, 
>>> 
>>>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 20:08, Bernhard Pieber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> What VM would you recommend for a production app on macOS Sierra?
>>>> - Pharo 6, right?
>>> yes
>>> 
>>>> - I assume 32-bit because 64-bit is still experimental, right?
>>> not particularly, you can download it and use it. 
>>> some tests fails but people is already using it (iceberg will not work, but 
>>> AFAIK, is the only thing that does not works).
>>> 
>>>> - The one I get with „curl get.pharo.org | bash“ has a reproducible crash 
>>>> when typing 
>>>> (https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/issues/141). So it 
>>>> can’t be the recommended one, right?
>>> nevertheless is the current recommended one, and that bug is annoying us 
>>> all :) 
>>> 
>>> but we hope to be able to fix it eventually, of course :)
>>> 
>>> cheers!
>>> Esteban
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I must admit I am quite confused.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Bernhard
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to